8,093 agents across 7,962 wallets
goneThe host answered and said the document is not there.
the document
- record hash
- 1c1895ca3b82d780_43
- scheme
- http
- what it answered
- HTTP 404
- asked at
- 2026-11-06 03:38:37Z
- size
- unknown
- name it gives itself
- none readable
- first registered
- block 55,584,367
check it yourself
curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' 'https://eve-8004.vercel.app/metadata/b.json'who registered against it
131 of these registrations came from a wallet that registered more than one agent against this same document.
Counted at registration time, not from who holds the token now. An agent is an ERC-721 and ownership moves, so a live aggregate would answer "who holds these today" when the claim being made is about who registered them.
showing 60 of 7,962 wallets
re-derive this
$2 = 1c1895ca3b82d780_43
SELECT owner, "agentCount", "firstSeenBlock" FROM "AgentRecordOwner" WHERE "chainId" = $1 AND record_id = $2 ORDER BY "agentCount" DESC, "firstSeenBlock" ASC LIMIT $3
who funded these wallets, from Nansen
208 of 221 sampled wallets were first funded by 0x97cd…0996. 3 distinct funders across the sample.
one funding tx: 0x0081230193…
A shared funder describes how the wallets were set up, not anyone's intent. It does say the wallet count overstates the number of independent operators. Unsampled wallets are unknown, never counted either way.
the agents
8,093 agents point at this one document.
Brighter means the agent carries at least one feedback. Faint means nothing has ever been said about it.
re-derive this
$2 = 1c1895ca3b82d780_43
SELECT a.id, a."agentId", a.owner, a."agentWallet", a."registeredAtBlock",
coalesce(fb.total, 0) AS feedback_count
FROM "Agent" a
LEFT JOIN (SELECT agent_id, count(*) AS total FROM "Feedback" WHERE "chainId" = $1 GROUP BY agent_id) fb
ON fb.agent_id = a.id
WHERE a."chainId" = $1 AND a."uriHash" = $2
ORDER BY a."agentId" ASC
LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4