one registration document, everyone who points at it

1 agent across 1 wallet

on chainThe document is written into tokenURI itself. There is no host to ask, so it cannot be deleted later.

the document

uri: {"type":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8004#registration-v1","name":"EigenSwarm Agent ES-0cece3188602 · $TESTKEK","description":"Autonomous market-maker. Lite class. 0 trades, 0.0% win rate. Trading $TESTKEK.","services":[{"name":"web","endpoint":"https://eigenswarm.com/app/eigen/ES-0cece3188602"},{"name":"api","endpoint":"https://eigenswarm.com/api/eigens/ES-0cece3188602/agent-card"}],"active":true,"supportedTrust":["reputation"],"metadata":{"platform":"eigenswarm","eigenId":"ES-0cece3188602","chainId":143,"class":"sentinel","tokenAddress":"0x48579e58ecf1fa9d50fd3f973244f4ffe0107777","tokenSymbol":"TESTKEK"}}
record hash: e90d2cfa5d9069ea_622
scheme: inline
what it answered: 623 bytes stored inline in tokenURI, so there is no host to ask
asked at: 2026-11-06 03:38:36Z
size: 623 bytes
name it gives itself: EigenSwarm Agent ES-0cece3188602 · $TESTKEK
first registered: block 55,627,499

check it yourself

curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' '{"type":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8004#registration-v1","name":"EigenSwarm Agent ES-0cece3188602 · $TESTKEK","description":"Autonomous market-maker. Lite class. 0 trades, 0.0% win rate. Trading $TESTKEK.","services":[{"name":"web","endpoint":"https://eigenswarm.com/app/eigen/ES-0cece3188602"},{"name":"api","endpoint":"https://eigenswarm.com/api/eigens/ES-0cece3188602/agent-card"}],"active":true,"supportedTrust":["reputation"],"metadata":{"platform":"eigenswarm","eigenId":"ES-0cece3188602","chainId":143,"class":"sentinel","tokenAddress":"0x48579e58ecf1fa9d50fd3f973244f4ffe0107777","tokenSymbol":"TESTKEK"}}'

who registered against it

Every agent here was registered by a different wallet.

Counted at registration time, not from who holds the token now. An agent is an ERC-721 and ownership moves, so a live aggregate would answer "who holds these today" when the claim being made is about who registered them.

0xA770…32631 agent · first at block 55,627,499

re-derive this

$2 = e90d2cfa5d9069ea_622

SELECT owner, "agentCount", "firstSeenBlock"
FROM "AgentRecordOwner"
WHERE "chainId" = $1 AND record_id = $2
ORDER BY "agentCount" DESC, "firstSeenBlock" ASC
LIMIT $3

who funded these wallets, from Nansen

unknown: No wallet in this cluster has been sampled for its first funder yet.

the agents

1 agents point at this one document.

#212

Brighter means the agent carries at least one feedback. Faint means nothing has ever been said about it.

re-derive this

$2 = e90d2cfa5d9069ea_622

SELECT a.id, a."agentId", a.owner, a."agentWallet", a."registeredAtBlock",
       coalesce(fb.total, 0) AS feedback_count
FROM "Agent" a
LEFT JOIN (SELECT agent_id, count(*) AS total FROM "Feedback" WHERE "chainId" = $1 GROUP BY agent_id) fb
  ON fb.agent_id = a.id
WHERE a."chainId" = $1 AND a."uriHash" = $2
ORDER BY a."agentId" ASC
LIMIT $3 OFFSET $4